Abstract
The already existing artificial intelligence (AI) GPT has attracted widespread attention across various fields. As a natural language processing tool driven by AI technology, GPT has presented huge advantages in copywriting, coding, translation, thesis writing, etc. The application of GPT in various areas brings both benefits and challenges. In the publishing industry, GPT plays pivotal roles in multiple aspects, including authors, reviewers, and editorial offices, and affects the processes of review, publication, and publication service. While it showcases its tremendous advantages in developing journals, there are also many drawbacks. This study aims to demonstrate how to effectively apply GPT to promote the healthy development of the journal Recent Progress of Sciences.
References
Bhayana R, Krishna S, Bleakney RR. Performance of ChatGPT on a Radiology Board-style Examination: Insights into Current Strengths and Limitations. Radiology. 2023;307(5):e230582. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230582.
Malhotra K, Wiesenfeld B, Major VJ, Grover H, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Testa P, et al. Health system-wide access to generative artificial intelligence: the New York University Langone Health experience. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2024;32(2):268-274. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae285.
Lee TK. Artificial intelligence and posthumanist translation: ChatGPT versus the translator. Applied Linguistics Review. 2024;15(6):2351-2372. DOI: doi:10.1515/applirev-2023-0122.
Silva CAGd, Ramos FN, de Moraes RV, Santos ELd. ChatGPT: Challenges and Benefits in Software Programming for Higher Education. Sustainability. 2024;16(3):1245, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1245.
Mondal H, Mondal S. ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2023;71(12), https://journals.lww.com/ijo/fulltext/2023/71120/chatgpt_in_academic_writing__maximizing_its.6.aspx.
Kadi G, Aslaner MA. Exploring ChatGPT's abilities in medical article writing and peer review. Croat Med J. 2024;65(2):93-100. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.93.
Li Z-q, Wang X-f, Liu J-p. Publication Trends and Hot Spots of ChatGPT’s Application in the Medicine. Journal of Medical Systems. 2024;48(1):52. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-024-02074-y.
Dadkhah M, Oermann MH, Hegedüs M, Raman R, Dávid LD. Diagnosis Unreliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation. Adv Pharm Bull. 2024;14(1):1-4. DOI: 10.34172/apb.2024.020.
Pearson H. Can AI review the scientific literature - and figure out what it all means? Nature. 2024;635(8038):276-278. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-024-03676-9.
Conroy G. Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch - but is it any good? Nature. 2023;619(7970):443-444. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-02218-z.
Hadan H, Wang DM, Mogavi RH, Tu J, Zhang-Kennedy L, Nacke LE. The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. 2024;2(2):100095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100095.
Conroy G. Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers. Nature. 2023. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-02477-w.
RetractionWatch. Papers and peer reviews with evidence of ChatGPT writing. Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/papers-and-peer-reviews-with-evidence-of-chatgpt-writing/.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Recent Progress in Sciences Editorial Office (Author)